MemoraX 58.02
Cycle 1 · First place · Overall score. 15 entries in this division.
View full results ↘
Agent Memory
Leaderboard
PAST COMPETITIONS / CYCLE 1
Cycle 1 Competition Results
Official results of the first Agent Memory Challenge (2026), with separate standings for commercial products and open-source methods in Textual Memory and Coding Memory.
MemoraX 62.00%
Cycle 1 · First place · Overall Resolved. 15 entries in this division.
View full results ↘InvMem 45.06
Cycle 1 · First place · Overall score. 50 entries in this division.
View full results ↘AM-Link 52.67%
Cycle 1 · First place · Overall Resolved. 8 systems achieved this highest resolution rate. 43 entries in this division.
View full results ↘CYCLE 1 / TEXTUAL15 entries
Textual Memory · Commercial products
MemoraX ranks first in this division with an Overall score of 58.02. Overall and capability scores are reported on a 0–100 scale.
| Rank | System / version | Overall | A Explicit Fact Recall | B Compositional Inference | C Temporal & Event Reasoning | D Memory Governance | E Personalization & Care | G Context Learning & Execution | H Safety & Privacy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MemoraX | 58.02 | 89.89 | 63.44 | 60.00 | 51.19 | 58.51 | 29.99 | 58.39 |
| 2 | MemOS | 45.89 | 68.95 | 53.41 | 56.53 | 44.30 | 48.73 | 9.82 | 56.13 |
| 3 | NTES-MEMORY-SMART | 44.21 | 55.57 | 46.80 | 20.60 | 31.24 | 56.96 | 27.74 | 29.03 |
| 4 | AML-Eval-FLASH | 43.65 | 55.43 | 43.66 | 22.28 | 30.93 | 56.06 | 27.26 | 29.68 |
| 5 | Cognee | 42.61 | 53.62 | 42.90 | 22.01 | 32.14 | 54.49 | 27.11 | 29.03 |
| 6 | NTES-MEMORY-MQ-LAYER | 42.11 | 52.35 | 41.82 | 21.51 | 32.11 | 53.37 | 27.81 | 32.90 |
| 7 | TencentDB | 41.48 | 50.44 | 39.12 | 21.89 | 31.54 | 53.10 | 28.66 | 34.84 |
| 8 | Mem0 | 41.40 | 50.60 | 42.70 | 17.43 | 36.04 | 55.29 | 27.36 | 37.42 |
| 9 | MemPalace | 39.48 | 58.77 | 51.59 | 30.59 | 33.16 | 57.14 | 6.86 | 43.87 |
| 10 | Vectorize Hindsight Cloud | 38.54 | 46.43 | 40.43 | 16.87 | 34.83 | 55.69 | 24.32 | 39.35 |
| 11 | memory-dense | 37.65 | 44.88 | 33.04 | 17.77 | 29.96 | 51.66 | 26.67 | 32.26 |
| 12 | 星际罗盘 | 35.64 | 42.00 | 38.77 | 13.04 | 33.63 | 40.49 | 25.57 | 42.58 |
| 13 | memory-8000 | 34.22 | 51.69 | 37.38 | 30.31 | 25.93 | 51.53 | 8.98 | 33.23 |
| 14 | SuperMemory | 29.63 | 28.42 | 26.17 | 13.99 | 24.70 | 51.05 | 25.44 | 47.74 |
| 15 | NTES-MEMORY-TDAM | 26.30 | 20.92 | 19.28 | 8.99 | 10.46 | 50.02 | 26.25 | 56.77 |
CYCLE 1 / CODING15 entries
Coding Memory · Commercial products
MemoraX ranks first in this division with an Overall Resolved rate of 62.00%. Task-type resolution rates and resource performance categories are listed below.
| Rank | System / version | Overall Resolved (%) | New Feature (%) | Bug Fix (%) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Return Size | Write Time | Search Time | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MemoraX | 62.00 | 70.59 | 57.58 | Low | High | Compact | Medium | Medium | Fast |
| 2 | claude-mem | 52.00 | 56.86 | 49.49 | Low | Low | Compact | Medium | Fast | Fast |
| 3 | hs v3 | 52.00 | 56.86 | 49.49 | High | Medium | Balanced | Fast | Slow | Medium |
| 4 | MemOS | 52.00 | 54.90 | 50.51 | Low | High | Compact | Slow | Fast | Medium |
| 6 | Anonymous PIE | 51.33 | 62.75 | 45.45 | Low | Medium | Compact | Fast | Fast | Medium |
| 7 | mem0-api | 51.33 | 50.98 | 51.52 | Low | Medium | Compact | Slow | Medium | Fast |
| 5 | memory-dense | 51.33 | 54.90 | 49.49 | Medium | Medium | Balanced | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 8 | Cognee | 50.67 | 58.82 | 46.46 | Medium | High | Verbose | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 9 | Minda-Mem | 50.67 | 52.94 | 49.49 | Low | Low | Compact | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 10 | NTES-MEMORY-MQ-LAYER | 50.00 | 56.86 | 46.46 | Medium | Medium | Verbose | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 11 | NTES-MEMORY-SMART | 50.00 | 54.90 | 47.47 | High | High | Balanced | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 12 | MemPalace | 49.33 | 56.86 | 45.45 | High | High | Balanced | Medium | Fast | Fast |
| 13 | SuperMemory | 49.33 | 50.98 | 48.48 | High | Medium | Compact | Medium | Medium | Fast |
| 14 | TencentDB | 49.33 | 54.90 | 46.46 | Low | Low | Compact | Slow | Fast | Slow |
| 15 | Vectorize Hindsight Cloud | 46.67 | 50.98 | 44.44 | Medium | Low | Compact | Medium | Slow | Medium |
CYCLE 1 / TEXTUAL50 entries
Textual Memory · Open-source methods
InvMem ranks first in this division with an Overall score of 45.06. Overall and capability scores are reported on a 0–100 scale.
| Rank | System / version | Overall | A Explicit Fact Recall | B Compositional Inference | C Temporal & Event Reasoning | D Memory Governance | E Personalization & Care | G Context Learning & Execution | H Safety & Privacy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | InvMem | 45.06 | 56.78 | 45.96 | 21.77 | 32.62 | 53.14 | 30.77 | 30.32 |
| 2 | Refind | 44.97 | 57.75 | 45.30 | 19.62 | 33.33 | 52.77 | 28.30 | 30.32 |
| 3 | ActiveMemoryIndex | 44.84 | 56.87 | 45.04 | 18.35 | 37.95 | 54.57 | 29.66 | 32.90 |
| 4 | Hybrid Search v2.0 | 44.57 | 57.87 | 46.81 | 20.93 | 32.08 | 52.56 | 26.74 | 30.32 |
| 5 | ChronoHybridMem | 44.33 | 55.72 | 44.44 | 23.30 | 32.94 | 57.13 | 28.31 | 35.00 |
| 6 | Hybrid Episodic Memory | 44.28 | 55.51 | 45.90 | 21.56 | 34.23 | 57.29 | 28.08 | 27.10 |
| 7 | Chronicle | 44.19 | 56.20 | 43.93 | 21.23 | 30.40 | 52.58 | 28.56 | 30.32 |
| 8 | FlowGrid_AML_Retriever | 43.98 | 55.59 | 45.19 | 21.13 | 27.86 | 51.29 | 29.24 | 30.32 |
| 9 | LLLMemoryAgent | 43.06 | 54.52 | 42.70 | 24.62 | 30.32 | 53.51 | 27.63 | 29.68 |
| 10 | aml-memory-mvp | 42.95 | 54.83 | 43.30 | 18.00 | 32.31 | 54.36 | 27.26 | 29.03 |
| 11 | TraceMem | 42.53 | 52.45 | 42.52 | 18.35 | 36.34 | 55.47 | 27.61 | 34.84 |
| 12 | Memoria | 42.33 | 52.34 | 42.53 | 18.03 | 33.89 | 56.21 | 27.46 | 30.32 |
| 13 | Raw Memory | 42.31 | 50.23 | 45.06 | 18.30 | 38.04 | 57.80 | 28.15 | 36.13 |
| 14 | fenghe | 42.26 | 53.05 | 41.21 | 16.24 | 33.69 | 51.02 | 28.17 | 31.61 |
| 15 | AMC-Memory | 42.22 | 52.92 | 37.93 | 19.78 | 29.00 | 53.15 | 28.32 | 32.26 |
| 16 | MemMachine | 42.18 | 63.47 | 53.11 | 37.92 | 38.73 | 44.23 | 11.70 | 30.32 |
| 17 | causal-memory | 42.10 | 53.20 | 40.95 | 21.11 | 31.69 | 54.21 | 26.69 | 25.16 |
| 18 | aml-rag | 42.09 | 51.95 | 42.50 | 18.07 | 33.80 | 54.45 | 28.03 | 29.68 |
| 19 | Mem0 | 42.07 | 58.72 | 49.01 | 26.83 | 35.28 | 44.23 | 18.19 | 52.90 |
| 20 | Mem517 | 41.89 | 51.47 | 41.99 | 16.27 | 31.20 | 51.76 | 28.62 | 36.77 |
| 21 | AM-Link | 41.82 | 52.86 | 42.83 | 17.64 | 30.85 | 51.30 | 27.50 | 29.68 |
| 22 | SQLite-FTS-Baseline | 41.79 | 51.47 | 38.44 | 21.88 | 33.40 | 55.09 | 28.50 | 27.74 |
| 23 | fdmem | 41.28 | 51.54 | 41.54 | 20.86 | 31.01 | 50.24 | 27.05 | 32.90 |
| 24 | nano-memory_chris | 41.18 | 51.00 | 39.16 | 19.62 | 30.53 | 54.89 | 27.75 | 22.58 |
| 25 | aml-memory-baseline | 40.78 | 50.88 | 37.42 | 20.99 | 30.04 | 53.16 | 27.47 | 25.81 |
| 26 | TencentDB Agent Memory | 40.78 | 51.11 | 36.67 | 23.13 | 32.07 | 53.59 | 26.22 | 27.10 |
| 27 | Hindsight AML Adapter aml-v0.3.0 | 40.76 | 51.01 | 42.96 | 17.94 | 34.48 | 54.31 | 25.42 | 32.26 |
| 28 | agent-memory-version1_B1 | 40.68 | 50.15 | 38.56 | 23.62 | 27.84 | 53.21 | 28.04 | 26.45 |
| 29 | SimpleMem | 40.49 | 50.04 | 43.55 | 15.91 | 33.61 | 51.35 | 25.31 | 41.94 |
| 30 | memfusion | 40.25 | 47.19 | 38.06 | 14.77 | 28.20 | 50.46 | 30.88 | 28.39 |
| 31 | PI-mem | 40.03 | 50.21 | 37.64 | 24.92 | 32.76 | 43.42 | 28.19 | 32.90 |
| 32 | mem0-BQE | 39.83 | 49.30 | 43.11 | 18.00 | 34.05 | 56.89 | 22.84 | 42.58 |
| 33 | M-flow | 39.61 | 61.14 | 42.34 | 35.42 | 28.38 | 58.32 | 3.47 | 56.77 |
| 34 | openProustian-agent-memory | 39.04 | 46.41 | 35.94 | 19.97 | 30.73 | 56.30 | 26.47 | 36.77 |
| 35 | just-a-BM25 | 38.47 | 45.93 | 32.66 | 19.86 | 30.25 | 55.37 | 26.56 | 33.55 |
| 36 | agent-memory-service | 38.04 | 46.12 | 37.39 | 17.83 | 33.67 | 54.92 | 24.37 | 40.00 |
| 37 | LightMem-Ego-lite | 38.03 | 45.68 | 34.97 | 20.99 | 32.56 | 56.21 | 24.07 | 36.13 |
| 38 | ConstructMemory-AMC | 37.81 | 43.23 | 27.58 | 17.97 | 33.80 | 55.53 | 26.71 | 47.10 |
| 39 | M2A | 36.92 | 41.33 | 27.08 | 15.03 | 32.98 | 55.04 | 28.00 | 43.87 |
| 40 | memoria_github_fireme_v3 | 36.57 | 42.93 | 36.21 | 20.60 | 19.82 | 52.58 | 26.79 | 33.55 |
| 41 | Infini-memory | 36.17 | 43.29 | 32.16 | 13.15 | 14.39 | 40.28 | 27.40 | 51.61 |
| 42 | TraceMem v0.2.0 | 35.51 | 38.13 | 33.35 | 13.12 | 26.19 | 52.94 | 27.94 | 40.00 |
| 43 | LightMem-StuctMem | 35.48 | 38.73 | 34.86 | 19.47 | 33.79 | 55.64 | 26.73 | 44.52 |
| 44 | picoagent | 34.69 | 40.24 | 31.29 | 18.71 | 26.15 | 49.66 | 24.01 | 38.71 |
| 45 | MemoryBear | 34.30 | 37.57 | 33.98 | 18.24 | 28.23 | 54.48 | 25.92 | 29.68 |
| 46 | AML-HM | 33.87 | 36.98 | 25.23 | 13.26 | 24.56 | 51.47 | 27.32 | 45.97 |
| 47 | LightMem | 28.77 | 29.78 | 27.37 | 14.65 | 28.89 | 54.09 | 19.65 | 52.26 |
| 48 | perseus-vault | 25.52 | 21.14 | 18.44 | 10.19 | 18.54 | 49.98 | 26.65 | 38.06 |
| 49 | Aranea-Agents-Memory-Correct | 24.56 | 17.25 | 17.61 | 8.90 | 18.51 | 51.45 | 29.04 | 39.35 |
| 50 | agent-memory-leaderboard | 23.55 | 18.12 | 14.56 | 8.61 | 14.57 | 48.06 | 23.38 | 67.74 |
CYCLE 1 / CODING43 entries
Coding Memory · Open-source methods
AM-Link ranks first in this division with an Overall Resolved rate of 52.67%. Task-type resolution rates and resource performance categories are listed below.
| Rank | System / version | Overall Resolved (%) | New Feature (%) | Bug Fix (%) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Return Size | Write Time | Search Time | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AM-Link | 52.67 | 56.86 | 50.51 | High | High | Verbose | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 2 | AMC-Memory | 52.67 | 58.82 | 49.49 | Medium | High | Balanced | Fast | Medium | Fast |
| 3 | aml-memory-baseline | 52.67 | 56.86 | 50.51 | High | High | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Medium |
| 4 | aml-memory-mvp | 52.67 | 54.90 | 51.52 | High | High | Verbose | Slow | Slow | Slow |
| 5 | causal-memory | 52.67 | 62.75 | 47.47 | Low | Medium | Verbose | Slow | Fast | Slow |
| 6 | Hybrid Episodic Memory | 52.67 | 56.86 | 50.51 | Medium | Low | Balanced | Fast | Medium | Fast |
| 7 | Memoria | 52.67 | 60.78 | 48.48 | Medium | Medium | Balanced | Medium | Fast | Fast |
| 8 | nano-memory_chris | 52.67 | 56.86 | 50.51 | Medium | Medium | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 9 | agent-memory-version1_B1 | 52.00 | 50.98 | 52.53 | Low | Low | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 10 | ChronoHybridMem | 52.00 | 60.78 | 47.47 | High | High | Balanced | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 11 | mem0-BQE | 52.00 | 56.86 | 49.49 | High | High | Compact | Slow | Slow | Slow |
| 12 | MemoryBear | 52.00 | 58.82 | 48.48 | High | Medium | Balanced | Slow | Fast | Slow |
| 13 | agent-memory-service | 51.33 | 56.86 | 48.48 | High | Medium | Compact | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 20 | InvMem | 51.33 | 56.86 | 48.48 | High | High | Balanced | Fast | Medium | Fast |
| 14 | LightMem | 51.33 | 58.82 | 47.47 | Low | Low | Compact | Slow | Slow | Slow |
| 15 | memoria_github_fireme_v3 | 51.33 | 52.94 | 50.51 | Medium | Medium | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 16 | MidgetMEM | 51.33 | 56.86 | 48.48 | Medium | Low | Balanced | Fast | Medium | Slow |
| 17 | picoagent | 51.33 | 50.98 | 51.52 | Low | Low | Compact | Medium | Fast | Fast |
| 18 | TencentDB Agent Memory | 51.33 | 54.90 | 49.49 | Low | Medium | Compact | Slow | Fast | Slow |
| 19 | TraceMem v0.2.0 | 51.33 | 62.75 | 45.45 | Medium | Medium | Balanced | Medium | Medium | Fast |
| 21 | Aranea-Agents-Memory-Correct | 50.67 | 54.90 | 48.48 | High | Low | Balanced | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 22 | Infini-memory | 50.67 | 54.90 | 48.48 | Medium | High | Balanced | Fast | Slow | Fast |
| 23 | perseus-vault | 50.67 | 52.94 | 49.49 | Medium | Medium | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 24 | fenghe | 50.00 | 52.94 | 48.48 | Medium | Medium | Verbose | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 25 | Lightmem-StructMem | 50.00 | 56.86 | 46.46 | Low | Low | Compact | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 26 | Refind | 50.00 | 56.86 | 46.46 | High | High | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 27 | SQLite-FTS-Baseline | 50.00 | 60.78 | 44.44 | Low | Low | Compact | Fast | Medium | Medium |
| 28 | FlowGrid_AML_Retriever | 49.33 | 50.98 | 48.48 | Low | Medium | Verbose | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 29 | Scriptorium | 49.33 | 54.90 | 46.46 | Low | Low | Compact | Fast | Medium | Medium |
| 30 | agent-memory-leaderboard | 48.67 | 49.02 | 48.48 | Low | Medium | Compact | Slow | Slow | Medium |
| 31 | Mem0 | 48.67 | 50.98 | 47.47 | High | High | Verbose | Slow | Slow | Slow |
| 32 | AML-HM | 48.00 | 52.94 | 45.45 | Medium | Low | Compact | Slow | Medium | Slow |
| 33 | Chronicle | 48.00 | 52.94 | 45.45 | Low | Low | Verbose | Fast | Fast | Fast |
| 34 | openProustian-agent-memory | 48.00 | 54.90 | 44.44 | Medium | Medium | Balanced | Slow | Slow | Slow |
| 35 | RawMem | 48.00 | 52.94 | 45.45 | High | High | Verbose | Slow | Fast | Slow |
| 36 | SimpleMem | 48.00 | 50.98 | 46.46 | Medium | Low | Compact | Slow | Slow | Slow |
| 37 | Hybrid Search v2.0 | 47.33 | 52.94 | 44.44 | Medium | High | Verbose | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 38 | Mem517 | 47.33 | 43.14 | 49.49 | High | High | Balanced | Medium | Slow | Medium |
| 39 | memfusion | 47.33 | 52.94 | 44.44 | Medium | High | Verbose | Fast | Medium | Fast |
| 40 | MemMachine | 47.33 | 52.94 | 44.44 | High | High | Verbose | Slow | Medium | Slow |
| 41 | Raw Memory | 47.33 | 47.06 | 47.47 | Low | Low | Compact | Slow | Medium | Slow |
| 42 | ActiveMemoryIndex | 46.67 | 52.94 | 43.43 | Low | Low | Balanced | Slow | Medium | Slow |
| 43 | Mi-Memory-reset | 46.00 | 47.06 | 45.45 | Low | Low | Compact | Slow | Slow | Slow |
CYCLE 1 / MULTIMODAL
Multimodal Memory
The first competition did not include a Multimodal Memory track.
Evaluation Notes
- Results are listed separately by track and division. Textual Memory and Coding Memory evaluate different tasks; their scores are not directly comparable.
- Textual Memory results include an Overall score and seven capability scores: Explicit Fact Recall, Compositional Inference, Temporal & Event Reasoning, Memory Governance, Personalization & Care, Context Learning & Execution, and Safety & Privacy.
- Coding Memory results include Overall Resolved, New Feature, and Bug Fix resolution rates. Resource performance is reported by category: Low / Medium / High for token usage, Compact / Balanced / Verbose for return size, and Fast / Medium / Slow for execution time.
Citation
Suggested citation: Agent Memory Leaderboard. Cycle 1 Agent Memory Challenge Results (2026). Published August 12, 2026.
When citing a result, specify the track, division, system name and version, and metric, and include the result page URL.
https://agentmemoryleaderboard.ai/results/cycle-1/
Any corrections will be announced on this page with the date and details of the change.
Subsequent Competitions
For Cycle 2 participation requirements and API integration, see the following pages. Cycle 2 Participation Rules · API Integration Guide
Agent Memory Leaderboard · Cycle 1 · 2026